-
Forum
-
Call Now
Is it cheaper to leave the immersion on all the time?
| ♥ 0 |
My electric bill is really high, my friend says that leaving the immersion heater on all the time saves money as the cylinder doesn’t have to keep reheating from cold. Is this true?
Marked as spam
Asked on 01/08/2026 14:24
4 views
Add comment
|
|
✔
|
Private answer
In most cases, no. Leaving an immersion heater on all the time is usually more expensive than heating the water only when you need it. Your hot water cylinder is insulated, but it isn't perfect. As it sits full of hot water, it continually loses heat through the insulation. If the immersion heater is left on permanently, it keeps switching on to replace that lost heat, using electricity throughout the day and night. A more economical approach is to: Use a timer to heat the cylinder before you need hot water, such as in the morning and evening. The idea that it's cheaper because the cylinder doesn't have to "heat from cold" is a common myth. Heating water from 20°C to 60°C uses essentially the same amount of energy whether it's done all at once or by topping up small heat losses throughout the day. The difference is that leaving the immersion on all the time means you're continually replacing heat that's escaped from the cylinder, so you'll generally use more electricity overall. If your electricity bills are unusually high, it's also worth checking that: The immersion heater isn't stuck on because of a faulty thermostat. For most households, the cheapest option is to heat only the amount of hot water you need, when you need it, using a timer rather than leaving the immersion heater on 24 hours a day. See this article from EasyFlow: Marked as spam
Answered on 01/08/2026 14:31
|



